Archive for February, 2004
Friday, February 27th, 2004
GNATS is a BTS developed as part of the GNU Project. One of their users set up a page of GNATS web resources, which includes not only GNATS tips but links to other bugtracking (and revision control) systems.
Popularity: 32% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting systems | Comments Off
Friday, February 27th, 2004
Roman Vichr’s IBM DeveloperWorks article Tips and tricks: a bug’s life lists the features that you might want to consider in a bug tracking system. It also links to several systems.
Popularity: 31% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting systems | Comments Off
Friday, February 27th, 2004
The Eclipse project has a set of bug writing guidelines, including a great deal of detail about what should go in bug reports. It also gives some motivation for writing good bug reports.
Popularity: 44% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting tips | Comments Off
Friday, February 27th, 2004
The Debian bug tracking software is an email based bug-tracking system. All bug submissions and updates are handled via email. There is also a web based system for viewing bug reports.
The Debian BTS was developed for use by the Debian project.
Popularity: 31% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting systems | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 18th, 2004
In order to close more than a fraction of the 7000 open bugs in GNOME bugzilla, Luis Villa is organising regular bug days. The next bug day is entitled strength in numbers.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Posted in Bug squish days | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 18th, 2004
Mark Pilgrim dives in where unit tests can’t save him: the depths of libxml2 and client-server communication.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Posted in Bug anatomies | Comments Off
Friday, February 13th, 2004
Panopticon Central has Ten Rules of Performance.
Popularity: 32% [?]
Posted in Debugging resources | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 11th, 2004
del.icio.us yielded up two Java debuggers for me: Omniscient Debugger and FindBugs — a bug pattern finder.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Posted in Debugging resources | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 11th, 2004
Eric S Raymond and Rick Moen have a HOWTO on asking questions of technical groups the smart way. See in particular the section about not assuming a particular behaviour is a bug.
Popularity: 46% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting tips | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 11th, 2004
Good technical questions have many similarities with good bug reports: see in particular The Cardinal Rule of Reporting Technical Problems:
Never, never, never, never, never say `doesn’t work’.
Never.
Proper Prophylaxis:
Just say “I wanted X, but it does Y. How do I get X?”
Popularity: 51% [?]
Posted in Basic advice: newcomers to bugs, Bug reporting tips | Comments Off
Sunday, February 8th, 2004
Lars Wirzenius taught his students binary search using bug hunting.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Posted in Debugging resources | Comments Off
Thursday, February 5th, 2004
Joel Spolsky illustrates painless bug tracking by example, advocating using a bug database and advising how to make people use it. He has a second article on the need for a good QA team.
Popularity: 59% [?]
Posted in Bug anatomies, Bug reporting tips | Comments Off
Wednesday, February 4th, 2004
Callum McKenzie rants about minimalistic patches that fix crashes without fixing the underlying problem.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Posted in Debugging resources | Comments Off
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2004
Fog Creek has released a web-based bug tracker and feature request system: FogBUGZ. (Via Joel on Software.) There’s a discussion forum available.
Popularity: 30% [?]
Posted in Bug reporting systems | Comments Off
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2004
Guido van Rossum has an essay on reference count debugging that argues that there’s no substitute for understanding the reference behaviour of your code.
Popularity: 32% [?]
Posted in Debugging resources | Comments Off
Monday, February 2nd, 2004
A DARPA funded project to encourage a community of auditors to review kernel source code for security related holes has failed due to lack of interest according to SecurityFocus. (Via slashdot.)
Popularity: 30% [?]
Posted in Bug projects | Comments Off
Monday, February 2nd, 2004
Chris De Herrera describes describes in detail researching a security problem on Windows Mobile 2003. (Via stargeek.)
Popularity: 32% [?]
Posted in Bug anatomies | Comments Off